White and Delightsome
I think I know a lot about the ignored history of the LDS church, but something new always comes along to prove my ignorance.
The summary provided at the beginning of Doctrine and Covenants 132 says “Although the revelation was recorded in 1843, it is evident from the historical records that the doctrines and principles involved in this revelation had been known by the Prophet since 1831.” This revelation is a commandment to practice polygamy although modern LDS interpretation no longer recognizes the “New and Everlasting Covenant” as referring to polygamy. I was always mildly curious about what documents this referred to and why the LDS church avoided going into greater detail. Now I know.
I recently learned that Joseph Smith received a revelation in 1831 advising Elders of the church that they would marry Lamanite and Nephite (i.e. American Indian) women. The reason the Lord laid this plan was so that the Indian race would become white again. For those who don’t know, Mormons historically taught that the American Indians—who had once been white-skinned—had been cursed by God for their ancestors’ wickedness. Their darker skins were a sign of this curse. Intermarriage with white men was apparently God’s way of lifting his curse on the Lamanites. As W. W. Phelps recorded Joseph Smith’s revelation from memory (as late as 1861):
For it is my will, that in time, ye should take unto you wives of the Lamanites and Nephites, that their posterity may become white, delightsome and Just, for even now their females are more virtuous than the gentiles.
It is thought that this revelation foreshadowed polygamy because many of those present when Joseph Smith received the revelation were already married. When W. W. Phelps asked how already married men could marry Lamanite women, he reports that Joseph said:
In the same manner that Abraham took Hagar and Keturah; and Jacob took Rachel, Bilhah and Zilpah; by revelation—the saints of the Lord are always directed by revelation.
The manuscript was suppressed for years by the LDS church who held it in their vaults away from the eyes of historians.
I guess it goes to show that a) Joseph Smith obviously wasn’t racist since he was an early advocate of racial intermarriage (and sometime sufferer of jungle fever) and b) there’s always new stuff to learn about those crazy early Mormons.
chandelle said,
December 22, 2007 @ 2:48 pm
that surely seems to contradict BY’s assertion that intermarriages would be struck down on the spot, doesn’t it?
Jonathan Blake said,
December 22, 2007 @ 6:05 pm
I hadn’t thought of Brigham’s statement, but wasn’t that about marriage to people of African descent? Let me research…
So he was probably OK with marriage to dark-skinned Lamanites but not dark-skinned Africans. That makes his racism a lot better, doesn’t it?
Seth R. said,
December 22, 2007 @ 7:26 pm
Joseph Smith was all about connections. His driving obsession, according to LDS historian Richard Bushman, was to bind people together – both as groups and as individuals. Polygamy can be traced to this impulse, as well as his concern with the fate of deceased individuals who died without the Gospel. Same thing with the literal gathering of Israel. This seems to fit the pattern. I already knew of his abolitionist tendencies.
Jonathan Blake said,
December 23, 2007 @ 5:33 pm
I still haven’t made up my mind how where along the spectrum from calculating scoundrel to honest religious experimenter Joseph fits.